In the wake of the most recent presidential
election there has been a growing movement of people wishing to break away
from the United States. The loudest
cries in the succession movement are coming from libertarians and the extreme
right of the Republican Party which is the Tea Party. They are not the only ones calling for this but they are the loudest. This essay is just one part in a series of
essays I will be writing covering some of the downfalls of any state; red, purple,
or blue who wish to pursue succession.
The first essay will focus on a major concern to many; Social Security.
Another fun fact about Social
Security is that it is estimated to keep roughly 40 percent of all Americans
age 65 or older out of poverty (1.)
Although this is an 8 year old statistic it is very reasonable to believe
that 40 percent is still at best the most optimal situation but considering the
recent global financial crisis it may even be higher than 40 percent.
So with all this being stated, if
a state were to go through with succession what would this mean for those
drawing social security or close to retirement?
What about states like Florida and Arizona where the amount of retirees
are much higher than in other states? Would there be anything put in place by the succeeding states or would people of every age have to fend for themselves? These
are a couple of the issues that would surely arise if states were to start
breaking away from the Union. Some could
take the Ayn Rand philosophy and merely shrug at those who weren’t prepared for
the collapse of the federal government but I have a hunch that a great deal elderly
people would face dire choices if they were to lose their Social Security benefits. And notice I called them benefits and not
entitlements; these elderly people have been paying a FICA tax most, if not
their entire working lives.
One possible solution to this
problem is that if a state were to succeed from the United States, the federal government could still
pay the benefits regardless of where the beneficiary lives. There is only one flaw with this scenario, I
do not see a federal government helping out a state that has just succeeded
from it. You can’t merely flip someone
the bird and then ask them for assistance.
Few people would be willing to do this and if the blood is that bad
between the U.S government and a succeeding state I doubt they will be any
different. With that being stated responsibility
for the elderly more than likely now becomes a state issue or rather a succeeding state issue.
Could these states bear such a
financial burden in the infancy of being an independent state and now a nation? It is very doubtful considering the other
financial burdens they would soon be getting ready to deal with due to their
new found freedom. There is also no
mechanism in place to deal with this on the state level, so what would people
do in the meantime till such a structure was established? Succeeding seems to bring more questions than
tangible answers and that is only on the issue of Social Security.
I am not in favor of any state succeeding
from the United States, period. For
better or worse we are one big family and merely saying I’m done and leaving
will weaken the government and create more burden on the succeeding state than
they can handle. I think the issues we
face as a nation are fixable assuming reasonable adults can sit down at the
table and agree on reasonable solutions.
Compromise is not a dirty word, it is the solution.
Works Cited
- Orr, D. (November – December, 2004). "Social Security Isn't Broken: So Why the Rush To 'Fix ' It? In C. Sturr & R. Vasudevan (Eds.), 2007, Current Economic Issues. Boston: Economic Affairs Bureau.